Comments on: It’s. Not. About. You. http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/ perspectives on stuff from an angry feminist Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:11:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5-RC2 By: Rebecca http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-984 Rebecca Mon, 05 May 2008 07:46:41 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-984 I don't exactly have anything to add to that, but I just wanted to say that I agree wholeheartedly, C.L. Hanson. I think you're spot on about how some of these women seem to see sex workers, and perhaps I didn't go far enough in this post. I think it's one of the advantages of the feminist blogosphere that we actually can get these arguments out there, and challenge some of the bullshit that's going around in feminist communities about sex work. Though I wish I could stand to actually read the average thread about it at a place like Feministe...those threads generally wind up with me wanting to throw things. I don’t exactly have anything to add to that, but I just wanted to say that I agree wholeheartedly, C.L. Hanson. I think you’re spot on about how some of these women seem to see sex workers, and perhaps I didn’t go far enough in this post.

I think it’s one of the advantages of the feminist blogosphere that we actually can get these arguments out there, and challenge some of the bullshit that’s going around in feminist communities about sex work. Though I wish I could stand to actually read the average thread about it at a place like Feministe…those threads generally wind up with me wanting to throw things.

]]>
By: C. L. Hanson http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-976 C. L. Hanson Sun, 04 May 2008 14:10:38 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-976 The fact that attacking the sex industry doesn't help the women in the sex industry <i>should</i> be totally obvious. Promoting the idea that you have to be a lost cause or a basket case to get in (and/or that being in the sex industry always does irreparable, traumatic damage) obviously creates a stigma that makes it that much harder to switch from this line of work to something more socially acceptable. It blows my mind that promoting this stigma could be considered "feminist." I think you've hit it on the head regarding the lack of empathy. I would go one step farther and say that the feminists who want to protect women from the sex industry typically see women who are in the industry as being <i>already</i> lost, fallen, and broken (possibly beyond repair ) . So these feminists aren't as concerned with helping women move into another line of work (or even less with helping those who want to stay in the sex industry to be healthy, safe, treated decently, etc. ) as much as they are concerned with protecting any more women from ever having this tragedy befall them. This is the only possible interpretation I can find for the "Prostitution Facts" graphic (which perhaps you've seen -- made to look like "Nutrition Facts" and run as an ad in magazines where prostitutes run their ads ) . In order to take a more reasonable look at the sex industry, one useful metaphor is to compare it to work performed by illegal immigrants. Here we have a lot of the same elements such as lack of police protection for workers creating a situation where employers can abuse them, and people ending up in certain types of jobs (which they may or may not want to be in) due to lack of other options. At the same time this example allows us to step back from the deep-rooted prejudice that becoming a "whore" turns a woman immediately from a person into worthless trash (a prejudice which has -- mystifyingly -- been absorbed wholesale into <i>feminist</i> theory... ) . I've discussed this in the comments of <a href="http://lfab-uvm.blogspot.com/2008/02/come-on-baby-wont-you-show-some-class.html" rel="nofollow">this post</a>. I think there are a lot of middle class women who have bought into the anti-sex-industry rhetoric just because that's what's been sold to them as the feminist party line and they haven't really thought about it. So I think it's useful to be discussing this on the internet in hopes of getting people to think a bit about what strategies actually benefit real women. The fact that attacking the sex industry doesn’t help the women in the sex industry should be totally obvious. Promoting the idea that you have to be a lost cause or a basket case to get in (and/or that being in the sex industry always does irreparable, traumatic damage) obviously creates a stigma that makes it that much harder to switch from this line of work to something more socially acceptable. It blows my mind that promoting this stigma could be considered “feminist.”

I think you’ve hit it on the head regarding the lack of empathy. I would go one step farther and say that the feminists who want to protect women from the sex industry typically see women who are in the industry as being already lost, fallen, and broken (possibly beyond repair ) . So these feminists aren’t as concerned with helping women move into another line of work (or even less with helping those who want to stay in the sex industry to be healthy, safe, treated decently, etc. ) as much as they are concerned with protecting any more women from ever having this tragedy befall them. This is the only possible interpretation I can find for the “Prostitution Facts” graphic (which perhaps you’ve seen — made to look like “Nutrition Facts” and run as an ad in magazines where prostitutes run their ads ) .

In order to take a more reasonable look at the sex industry, one useful metaphor is to compare it to work performed by illegal immigrants. Here we have a lot of the same elements such as lack of police protection for workers creating a situation where employers can abuse them, and people ending up in certain types of jobs (which they may or may not want to be in) due to lack of other options. At the same time this example allows us to step back from the deep-rooted prejudice that becoming a “whore” turns a woman immediately from a person into worthless trash (a prejudice which has — mystifyingly — been absorbed wholesale into feminist theory… ) .

I’ve discussed this in the comments of this post. I think there are a lot of middle class women who have bought into the anti-sex-industry rhetoric just because that’s what’s been sold to them as the feminist party line and they haven’t really thought about it. So I think it’s useful to be discussing this on the internet in hopes of getting people to think a bit about what strategies actually benefit real women.

]]>
By: Rebecca http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-745 Rebecca Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:54:27 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-745 <i>Considering the demographics of most of those forced to be in sex work to survive, the position taken by anti-sex-work people is pretty blatantly racist and transphobic, imho. IIRC, all of the better-known anti-sex-work people are white.</i> See - while you're very much right - I get the impression that it hasn't even been thought through on that level. None of these people seem to conceive of how they, themselves, given a less privileged background, might be faced with the reality of ending up in sex work. Thus, they are able to see it in the theoretical, the abstract - they can't conceive of how making the working conditions worse (or eliminating business altogether) for someone who's in it because they have to to survive is not making that person's life any easier - and that a more humane means of actually helping people who want out of sex work to get out might be to actually focus on that at an individual level, rather than political "war on prostitution" efforts. <i>This seems to be the same attitude that Westerners take when colonizing other countries. It’s like saving the “poor savages” from their “infidel religion”, by killing them if necessary.</i> I was a bit wary of making that analogy, being a white lady and all, but I do feel that it's pretty apt - it's that absolute insistence on riding in to the rescue, "saving" people - whether or not they want to be saved, or whether or not that actually improves the "saved" people's lives. Considering the demographics of most of those forced to be in sex work to survive, the position taken by anti-sex-work people is pretty blatantly racist and transphobic, imho. IIRC, all of the better-known anti-sex-work people are white.

See - while you’re very much right - I get the impression that it hasn’t even been thought through on that level. None of these people seem to conceive of how they, themselves, given a less privileged background, might be faced with the reality of ending up in sex work. Thus, they are able to see it in the theoretical, the abstract - they can’t conceive of how making the working conditions worse (or eliminating business altogether) for someone who’s in it because they have to to survive is not making that person’s life any easier - and that a more humane means of actually helping people who want out of sex work to get out might be to actually focus on that at an individual level, rather than political “war on prostitution” efforts.

This seems to be the same attitude that Westerners take when colonizing other countries. It’s like saving the “poor savages” from their “infidel religion”, by killing them if necessary.

I was a bit wary of making that analogy, being a white lady and all, but I do feel that it’s pretty apt - it’s that absolute insistence on riding in to the rescue, “saving” people - whether or not they want to be saved, or whether or not that actually improves the “saved” people’s lives.

]]>
By: belledame222 http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-742 belledame222 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:04:19 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-742 What they don’t have, though, is empathy.>> Isn't that always the bottom line? -sigh- What they don’t have, though, is empathy.>>

Isn’t that always the bottom line? -sigh-

]]>
By: GallingGalla http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-741 GallingGalla Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:45:49 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-741 <i>What in the fuck are the women who were doing sex work, say, because they can’t find another way to survive, or to pay for an addiction, supposed to do now? Do they get to starve while you folks cheer your (hypothetical) victory?</i> Considering the demographics of most of those forced to be in sex work to survive, the position taken by anti-sex-work people is pretty blatantly racist and transphobic, imho. IIRC, all of the better-known anti-sex-work people are white. <i>it’s far easier to feel better about oneself if one is getting to play the big feminist hero saving the poor wimmins</i> This seems to be the same attitude that Westerners take when colonizing other countries. It's like saving the "poor savages" from their "infidel religion", by killing them if necessary. <i>For gods sake, I’m about the most unlikely “sex-pozzie” around, seeing as I’m about the biggest prude around. The thing, it’s not about me.</i> Word, from this asexual person. Berg, et al: "Feminists", all. What in the fuck are the women who were doing sex work, say, because they can’t find another way to survive, or to pay for an addiction, supposed to do now? Do they get to starve while you folks cheer your (hypothetical) victory?

Considering the demographics of most of those forced to be in sex work to survive, the position taken by anti-sex-work people is pretty blatantly racist and transphobic, imho. IIRC, all of the better-known anti-sex-work people are white.

it’s far easier to feel better about oneself if one is getting to play the big feminist hero saving the poor wimmins

This seems to be the same attitude that Westerners take when colonizing other countries. It’s like saving the “poor savages” from their “infidel religion”, by killing them if necessary.

For gods sake, I’m about the most unlikely “sex-pozzie” around, seeing as I’m about the biggest prude around. The thing, it’s not about me.

Word, from this asexual person.

Berg, et al: “Feminists”, all.

]]>
By: Robbie http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-740 Robbie Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:13:06 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-740 Totally. The money in sex work can be amazing, especially on a per-hour basis. If someone can only get entry-level work, and they have to study or look after their children or anything else that prevents them from working long hours, then they won't get pay like that in any other field. Women (and trans dudes, and homos) will continue to enter into sex work for perfectly rational economic reasons as long as there are poor women (and trans dudes, and homos) and rich men. Totally. The money in sex work can be amazing, especially on a per-hour basis. If someone can only get entry-level work, and they have to study or look after their children or anything else that prevents them from working long hours, then they won’t get pay like that in any other field. Women (and trans dudes, and homos) will continue to enter into sex work for perfectly rational economic reasons as long as there are poor women (and trans dudes, and homos) and rich men.

]]>
By: RenegadeEvolution http://burningwords.net/2008/04/18/its-not-about-you/#comment-739 RenegadeEvolution Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:04:48 +0000 http://burningwords.net/?p=85#comment-739 Amen. Amen.

]]>